How low can the Statesman go? On Easter Sunday when every other media outlet is focusing on this Christian Holiday, the Statesman does a front page story on Claude Dallas.
When they do a story about Bill Sali’s opponents they only talk to four people who are critical of Sali and neglect to talk to the hundreds of thousands of Idahoans who support him.
When they do a story on Obama, they only talk to people who are supportive of Obama and not a single Idahoan who might disagree with his flimsy campaign.
When they do an editorial about disclosure in government they only mean disclosure for Republicans because they ignore the the revolving door of Kate Kelly and the questionable behavior of Bieter’s boys.
And when is Popkey going to come clean on the Craig story. Not to worry. wp2 will be sharing some exclusive interviews with you this week that will show what a sham the Statesman’s reporting has really been.
March 28, 2008 at 3:02 am |
What does Kate Kelly have against state employees? Why does she want to cripple their ability to get a good job after state employment? One topic of focus for the media this session has been improving compensation for state workers. Everybody acknowledges that they are sorely underpaid, when compared to their private sector peers. So how does Kate Kelly solve the problem? By making it well-nigh impossible to capitalize on those underpaid years by moving to a job that values your experience. Typical Democrat solution to a problem that doesn’t exist. Hey! Let’s distort the job markets by needlessly regulating them! Nice work, Kate. Too bad nobody at the Mis-Statesman has half a brain to even come up with one of these questions. It doesn’t take a lot of thought, people. Unless you’re interested in shielding Dems from criticism…
April 8, 2008 at 5:43 am |
Still waiting for those interviews which show what a “sham” the Statesman’s reporting on Craig has been…