Kevin Richert, one of the most liberal people in journalism, couldn’t even come clean on his editorial Sunday, March 9. wp2 found out that Richert the propaganda from none other than Walt Minnick.
Why wasn’t that in your story, Kevin?
And why don’t you give the Knowlegis, LLC non-partisan, private thing a rest? If it is so non-partisan why are you and Minnick jumping on it?
And oh by the way, why haven’t your really done your homework on why the ED of the Democrat party was fired? It wouldn’t be because Minnick and his wife are involved?
Let wp2 guess who you are going to endorse for the Dem 1st CD primary: Minnick perhaps?
And if he wins the primary are you going to endorse him for the general?
Your left wing newspaper still hasn’t done anything on Kate Kelly and her own revolving door. When are you going to look into what she has been doing?
You are constantly badgering Republicans to have open meeting laws and have full disclosure when you can’t even disclose where you got a simple piece of information.
How can readers believe anything you write?
How about that McClatchy stock? Still dropping I see.
March 14, 2008 at 11:15 pm |
What simple piece of information are you talking about? And open meeting laws don’t apply to private businesses, only government.
Seriously, you really think Richert is one of the most liberal people in journalism? Wow, you should start reading some more. And what propaganda are did he get from Minnick?
What’s your obsession with McClatchy’s stock price? Yea, it’s in the tank, like all newspaper companies. They own several dozen newspapers from what I understand, most of which are larger than the Statesman.
This blog keeps getting worse and worse. The writing is hardly readable, and the “points” make no sense.
It’s really too bad because the Statesman could use an intelligent, literate person holding their feet to the fire now and then. Disappointing.
March 19, 2008 at 3:52 am |
I’m curious as to your “revolving door” and Kate Kelly. Her last position at DEQ was an appointed position.